Though it is the end of the week, I have not forgotten that this week is National Medical Transcription Week. I’ve been busy…. well transcribing! There are not many MTs around as compared to years’ past, but I still want to say a big thank you to those of us who are still here transcribing for doctors, nurse practitioners, fellows, etc., who have withstood the many changes that have taken place over the years with being a medical transcriptionist, and lastly, being loyal to what you know and love. A patient’s medical record would not be in existence if not for the medical transcriptionist. As the trend of medical transcription has drastically changed over the years and evolved into more of the voice recognition editing, there are quite a few who are still doing the standard transcribing, which MTs consider ‘straight typing’ or ‘straight transcription.’
Speaking of voice recognition, here are a few ‘bloopers’ of voice recognition that we as medical transcriptionists/medical language specialists have to correct:
- Voice recognition picks up: ” Family accompanies her to the adult.” This should be: “Family accompanies her to the toilet.”
- Voice recognition: “Mother took patient to another antibiotic physician.” Should be: ” Mother took patient to a naturopathic physician.”
- Voice recognition: ” Vaginal exam also somewhat superman genitalia. Should be: “Vaginal exam reveals normal external genitalia.”
Though these ‘bloopers’ are our transcription funnies, there really is nothing to laugh about when it comes to these types of errors in a patient’s medical record. That is why it is extremely important to have a skilled, knowledgeable medical transcriptionist who knows and is thorough in medical terminology, anatomy and physiology and pharmacology to do this job, not just a typist! There is finally controversy and action being taken now regarding voice recognition versus traditional transcription and these types of errors occurring in the patients medical record. As voice recognition was designed to ‘pick up’ the doctors voice as he is dictating, it is actually doing more harm than good – something now even a very keen patient recognizes in his or her medical record, leaving the patient to take legal action for these gross negligent errors, all in the name of trying to ‘produce’ a certain amount of work rather than being quality conscious. A well-trained medical transcriptionist who remembers traditional transcription realizes that even to this day, it would be simpler to transcribe the entire report than try and ‘fix’ the edited/voice recognition version. That is a completely different subject that I will not acknowledge right now……
Again, Happy Medical Transcription Week everyone. Thank you for your hard work, your unique listening ear, your fast fingers on the keyboard, the long hours you put in, and your dedication to helping keep safeguard of each and every patients medical record!
A well-trained medical transcriptionist who remembers traditional transcription Interpreter Services Toronto realizes that even to this day, it would be simpler to transcribe the entire report than try and ‘fix’ the edited/voice recognition version.
Exactly right! Problem is, are the physicians willing to go back to dictating full reports and not having entered in the EHR? I really doubt it. There’s been too much money spent on developing EMR/EHR, so facilities are finding it simpler to have a scribe transcribe there work, both clinics and hospital settings.